The view from our side''incomprehensible''very human, able to penetrate and analyze some behaviors is a task that presents difficulties, especially in the subjective actions of our daily, because human beings are imperfect in some respects, so inexplicable. They are primarily inspegabili our dark sides that we often spevantano, and try to decode than a company that has everything except rational. These dark sides that frighten us and live within us as a little child, who at times comes out with all his wickedness, because it was repressed by a fake moralism built. Trying to get flights of fancy in our being self-improvement is to try to evolve towards a state of inner well-being, but this is totally hypocritical, because it is impossible to understand where we should push for a so-called self-improvement. Royalties we have inculcated, in which we believed we did hope for a better life, more attractive to us, but certainly not for others. All this arises out of range of a humanitarian conscience, scientific and theological. A reference book for this topic and to understand ourselves better is''Memoirs''of subsoil foederati Dostoevsky; artist who for me has revolutionized the way of writing is that the vision of human psychology. The book is divided into two parts, in which the first part is a monologue of social criticism, where there was a moral self-harm. In fact being made to counter all idelai positivism of the century: self-harm because the absolute perfection is not beautiful can never be achieved as there is a part of ourselves where lies in a secret desire of suffering, filth and self-humiliation, which can not be explained by no theory and no applied science in it. Both the science as theology can not come in against this state of being. The protagonist of this tale as a prime example of this fact and irrationality of this desire for suffering is shown by the fact that he was unable to "become even an insect." His drama is a deep internalization of the complexity of reality. In fact, he is considered a man too thoughtful, too busy to seek the cause of his action and, therefore, plagued by a substantial sloth, as opposed to the so-called men of action, which can impose the goals and follow through, due to their disregard for the root causes of their actions. The cause of the irrationality and the preference for human suffering would, according to the Underground Man, in its most expensive option: the one you want, for which he is also willing to give up its advantages. This goes against the laws of nature, exemplified by the product 2 x 2 = 4, in which the protagonist contrasts with the 2 x 2 = 5, one of the possible consequences of the triumph of individual will. For the protagonist, the only consequence of these considerations are sloth and inactivity, from which the withdrawal from social life, or its underground shelter that gives the title to the novel. The second part is a first-person narrative, in which the author confesses some of the previous dark monologue sordid actions he has done in his life, demonstrating how even a person "educated" and "way" as he can be profoundly abject. Even though, there was in him the desire to affirm its existence and not to succumb all'ignavia, albeit through unworthy acts. Responding to a debate that is set by this book is certainly not easy, but if each of us lives in times when you have situations that oppose our will our virtues. It 'an internal battle that in a moral conflict can not put any winner.
0 comments:
Post a Comment